凡是比較 iPhone 及 Android 就必定有一番罵戰。外國 Blaze.io 網站做了一個測試，進行了 45,000 個網頁瀏覽測試，得出Android 比 iPhone 平均快 52%，iPhone 在 84% 的網站比較慢。他們使用了 iPhone 4 (iOS 4.3) / iPhone 4 (iOS 4.2) / Galaxy S (Android 2.2) / Nexus S (Andriod 2.3) 四手機作此測試，詳情可到以下網址觀看
來源 :
分享到 :
最新影片
網頁瀏覽, Android 比 iPhone 平均快 52%
網頁瀏覽, Android 比 iPhone 平均快 52%
-
發佈日期2011-03-18
-
閱讀時間2分鐘
-
字體大小
呢單喺外國比人插到爆嘅騎呢測試都夠膽quote? 快啲去買塩喇…
using third-party app SunSpider to test on Safari doesn’t make any sense. there are a lot of restrictions for iOS in-app UIWebView. What a shame for this web analysis company does not know such a basic stuff. Please delete this wrong post in order to keep the quality. Next time, read and think carefully before you share anything from others.
Why are there lot of restriction for IOS in-app UIWebView?
UIWebView don’t share the same javaScript engine with Safari, and resource allocation is less than native Safari browser.
They are not comparing the native browser speed. Then it is still showing Android’s embedded browser is faster than IOS’s embedded browser.
翻譯西, 翻埋呢段喇唔該:
http://www.loopinsight.com/2011/03/17/study-comparing-android-to-iphone-web-browsing-speed-flawed/
Blaze has now admitted in a comment to CNET that their tests were flawed. It doesn’t seem right for a company to test a product unless they know for sure what technology it’s using.
“This test leveraged the embedded browser which is the only available option for iPhone applications,” reads the Blaze statement. “Blaze was under the assumption that Apple would apply the same updates to their embedded browser as they would their regular browser. If this is not the case and according to Apple’s response, it’s certainly possible the embedded browser might produce different results. If Apple decides to apply their optimizations across their embedded browser as well, then we would be more than willing to create a new report with the new performance results.”
Many many apple die hard idiot fans…….!!!
Yes, here so many blind I-lovers!
他們不會是”死硬”粉絲,只是一群坐於井下觀星之蛙而已